SHARE us!
|
Learn to survive better!
Listen to
The Armchair Survivalist
radio show
Copyright© and Trademarked™
1984-2012 by Survival Enterprises
All Rights Reserved
|
|
|
INFINITY
Prostate Protect
contains standardized saw palmetto
extract (clinically proven to inhibit benign prostate
enlargement) along with a balanced base of herbs and nutrients
that works synergistically to create an unparalleled level
of prostate protection.
With
a staggering percentage of the male population suffering
from some form of prostate related ailment (with many
believing their discomfort is an unavoidable result of
aging), promoting healthy prostate function is essential
for all men over 35.
|
|
Serving
Size: 2 Softgels
Suggested
Use: As a dietary supplement (especially for men),
take 2 softgels daily with meals.
Free
of: sugar, salt, starch, yeast, wheat, gluten, corn,
soy, milk, egg or preservatives.
Other
Ingredients: Gelatin, Glycerine, Carob Extract,
Beeswax and Purifed Water
| Servings Per Container: 45 |
|
|
Amount
Per Serving |
% Daily
Value |
| Calories |
9 |
|
| Pygeum Africanum
Bark Extract (13%) |
10 mg
|
† |
| Saw palmetto
Berry Extract†† (Serenoa repens) |
160 mg
|
† |
| Zinc (from
Zinc Gluconate) |
30 mg
|
200%
|
| Vitamin B-6
(as Pyridoxine HCl) |
10 mg
|
500%
|
| Total Fat
|
1.0 g
|
2%* |
| Calories from
Fat |
9 |
|
| Stinging Nettle
Root Extract (Urtica dioca) (30 ppm scopoletin)
|
250 mg
|
† |
| Pumpkin Seed
Oil |
950 mg
|
† |
| Lycopene (LYC-O-MATO®
- Natural Tomato Extract)) |
3 mg
|
† |
* Percent Daily Values are based on 2,000
calorie diet.
† Daily Value not established. |
|
You
may use the "Add to Cart"
button above, or see the
other ways to order
|
"These
statements have not been evaluated by the FDA.
This product is not intended to diagnose, cure, prevent or treat
any diseases."
The above is a Government ORDERED statement.
It is NOT based in either reality or sanity.
Just like our Government.
In
a landmark decision on Friday, Jan. 15, 1999, the US Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that
the health claim rules imposed by the FDA unconstitutional
and in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act.
The court instructed the FDA to allow the use of disclaimers on
labels rather than to suppress these claims outright.
The court further held prohibiting nutrient disease relationship
claims invalid under the first Amendment to the Constitution.
|
|
