|
|
INFINITY
Prostate Protect
contains standardized saw palmetto
extract (clinically proven to inhibit benign prostate enlargement)
along with a balanced base of herbs and nutrients that works
synergistically to create an unparalleled level of prostate
protection.
With
a staggering percentage of the male population suffering
from some form of prostate related ailment (with many believing
their discomfort is an unavoidable result of aging), promoting
healthy prostate function is essential for all men over
35.
|
|
Serving Size:
2 Softgels
Suggested
Use: As a dietary supplement (especially for men),
take 2 softgels daily with meals.
Free
of: sugar, salt, starch, yeast, wheat, gluten, corn,
soy, milk, egg or preservatives.
Other
Ingredients: Gelatin, Glycerine, Carob Extract, Beeswax
and Purifed Water
| Servings Per Container: 45 |
|
|
Amount
Per Serving |
% Daily
Value |
| Calories |
9 |
|
| Pygeum Africanum
Bark Extract (13%) |
10 mg
|
† |
| Saw palmetto
Berry Extract†† (Serenoa repens) |
160 mg
|
† |
| Zinc (from
Zinc Gluconate) |
30 mg
|
200%
|
| Vitamin B-6
(as Pyridoxine HCl) |
10 mg
|
500%
|
| Total Fat
|
1.0 g
|
2%* |
| Calories from
Fat |
9 |
|
| Stinging Nettle
Root Extract (Urtica dioca) (30 ppm scopoletin)
|
250 mg
|
† |
| Pumpkin Seed
Oil |
950 mg
|
† |
| Lycopene (LYC-O-MATO®
- Natural Tomato Extract)) |
3 mg
|
† |
* Percent Daily Values are based on 2,000
calorie diet.
† Daily Value not established. |
|
You
may use the "Add to Cart"
button above, or see the
other ways to order
|
Back to Nutritional
page.
See all our products

"These
statements have not been evaluated by the FDA.
This product is not intended to diagnose, cure, prevent or treat
any diseases."
The above is a Government ORDERED statement.
It is NOT based in either reality or sanity.
Just like our Government.
In a landmark decision
on Friday, Jan. 15, 1999, the US Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia ruled that the health claim rules imposed by the FDA
unconstitutional and in violation of the Administrative
Procedure Act. The court instructed the
FDA to define "significant scientific agreement" for health claims
on dietary supplement labels, and instructed the FDA to allow the
use of disclaimers on labels rather than to suppress these
claims outright. The court further held that four FDA Final rules
(prohibiting certain nutrient disease relationship claims) invalid
under the first Amendment to the Constitution.
|